<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss
  version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="https://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="https://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:content="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:blogChannel="https://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
  xmlns:atom="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>

<channel>
  <title>Diomidis D. Spinellis Web Log</title>
  <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog</link>
  <description>The Internet soapbox of Diomidis Spinellis</description>
  <dc:creator>dds</dc:creator>
  <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
  <dc:title>Diomidis D. Spinellis Web Log</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog</dc:identifier>
  <dc:date>2004-08-20T18:00:00-03:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <sy:updatePeriod>weekly</sy:updatePeriod>
  <sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
  <sy:updateBase>2003-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
  <generator>blog.pl 3c6ad07 2025-12-24 23:55:57 +0200</generator>
  <docs>https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <atom:link href="https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/dds-blog-rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

  <image rdf:about="https://www.spinellis.gr/dds.gif">
    <title>Diomidis D. Spinellis Web Log</title>
    <url>https://www.spinellis.gr/dds.gif</url>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog</link>
  </image>

  <item>
    <title>Why agentic AI needs better experts</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260708</link>
    <description>
 Over the past few days I  changed 
the way the  uutils  project’s
 sed  program
handles data to default from characters to raw bytes.
This improves compatibility with GNU  sed  and also performance.
Given the change’s size and extent
(13 changed files, 1740 insertions, 609 deletions),
I worked with an AI agent (OpenAI Codex),
which allowed me to experience first-hand both its power and limitations. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260708</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Why agentic AI needs better experts</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260708</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2026-07-08T10:30:24-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Documenting AI-generated code commits</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260702</link>
    <description>
 With ever-more program code created through generative AI,
it is important to document its provenance.
In industry this can help
diagnose the root cause of problems discovered long after the code was written,
locate issues with a similar cause,
and evaluate the cost and benefits of AI.
In educational settings it can help students be honest, mindful, reflective,
and transparent regarding their use of generative AI
and provide educators with data they can use
to evaluate objectively student work.
In both settings, provenance information can guide a code review’s focus
because humans and AI  fail in different ways . 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260702</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Documenting AI-generated code commits</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260702</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2026-07-08T08:00:37-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Why reviewing AI-generated code is devilishly hard</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260523</link>
    <description>
 Here’s the thing: when working on code with GenAI assistance
(from a chat-bot, through IDE auto-completion, or, increasingly,
with an AI agent)
you need a better understanding of the system than when working without.
Cognitive psychology and the workings of large language models (LLMs)
give us four clues on why this happens. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260523</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Why reviewing AI-generated code is devilishly hard</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260523</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2026-05-23T18:53:28-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Empirical software research in the age of AI</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260413</link>
    <description>
 In a keynote presentation at the 2026 Mining Software Repositories
Emerson Murphy-Hill, a star researcher at Microsoft, presented his
view on the role of an empirical software engineering researcher in the age of generative AI.
His talk focused on three themes: the durability, differentiation, and
dissemination of research. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260413</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Empirical software research in the age of AI</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260413</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2026-04-13T14:06:11-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Vibe coding toward the incident horizon</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260302</link>
    <description>
 We are living through a golden age of generative AI: a time when progress is both breathtaking and somehow still unable to reliably open a PDF without hallucinating the author’s middle name. The curve is real, the funding is real, and the demos are so real that they must be watched on a stage with dramatic lighting, because ordinary lighting reveals too much. The modern model does many things remarkably well—summarization, translation, code generation—and then it will confidently assert that 9 is a prime number “depending on your threat model,” which is how you know you’re witnessing history. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260302</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Vibe coding toward the incident horizon</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20260302</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2026-03-02T16:44:31-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>An initial analysis of the discovered Unix V4 tape</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20251223</link>
    <description>
 Several news outlets
 reported 
the  discovery of a 1970s Fourth Edition Research Unix magnetic tape 
at the University of Utah in July 2025 and its successful restoration.
This is a significant find, because up to now only
the Fourth Edition’s manual was thought to have survived.
Over the past few days I incorporated the tape’s source code into the
 Unix History Repository 
hosted on GitHub (see it  here )
and studied the code’s composition. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20251223</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>An initial analysis of the discovered Unix V4 tape</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20251223</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2025-12-23T18:18:55-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Why I choose email over messaging</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250926</link>
    <description>
 My colleagues and friends know that I prefer to communicate
with them via email rather than chat messaging.
There are many benefits in such a choice.
You may want to consider them and adopt the same stance. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250926</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Why I choose email over messaging</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250926</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2026-03-02T16:47:22-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Is it legal to use copyrighted works to train LLMs?</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250626</link>
    <description>
 Two widely-reported court rulings in San Francisco
found that employing copyrighted works to train Large Language Models (LLMs)
fell within the law’s “fair use” provisions.
The fact that writers brought these lawsuits shows that they felt wronged
by the use of their works to train LLMs without their permission.
What should we make of those rulings? 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250626</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Is it legal to use copyrighted works to train LLMs?</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250626</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2025-06-26T12:07:56-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>I’m removing the BSD advertising clause</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250520</link>
    <description>
 Some open source software I wrote decades ago was distributed with the
then-current BSD license, which included an advertising clause.
This hinders the code’s reuse and distribution, so I’m hereby declaring
that the clause’s requirements no longer apply to my code, and
that the corresponding clause can be deleted from it. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250520</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>I’m removing the BSD advertising clause</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250520</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2025-05-20T11:09:41-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>The perils of GenAI student submissions</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250411</link>
    <description>
 Generative AI (GenAI) systems, such as ChatGPT,
can help students as their personal tutor,
by allowing them to study what interests them,
by providing in depth explanations to topics they didn’t quite understand,
by assessing their work and problems with it, and
by providing shortcuts to parts of their work that aren’t directly relevant
to what they want to learn.
However, students sometimes
misuse GenAI
to derive answers for work they were supposed to conduct on their own as part
of their learning,
or accept its answers uncritically.
For the first type of misuse part of the blame occasionally
also lies with educators
for giving out-of-class assignments that GenAI can perform with ease.
For the second type of misuse students must learn to avoid using
unverified GenAI output.
Needless to say that in both cases the misuse of AI may also constitute
academic fraud and violate their university’s code of conduct.
Here is my take on the practicalities of the two cases. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250411</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>The perils of GenAI student submissions</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250411</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2025-04-11T03:31:35-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Unix make vs Apache Airflow</title>
    <link>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20241015</link>
    <description>
 In an  IEEE Software  “Adventures in Code” column titled
 Modular Data Analytics 
I describe the benefits and use of
 simple-rolap ,
a tool suite for relational online analytical processing.
I have built  simple-rolap  based on the Unix  make  tool and a few
shell scripts.
With  make  approaching its 50th birthday,
before writing the column
I looked for possible modern and better alternatives I might be ignoring. 
</description>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20241015</guid> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:creator>Diomidis Spinellis</dc:creator>
    <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
    <dc:title>Unix make vs Apache Airflow</dc:title> <!-- Hardcoded site here -->
    <dc:identifier>https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20241015</dc:identifier>
    <dc:date>2024-10-15T11:19:35-00:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
